Showing posts with label Islam moral panic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam moral panic. Show all posts

Saturday, January 21, 2017

The coming of Donald Trump: The future is anybody's guess!

Make no mistake about this: Donald Trump is an autocrat and a potential dictator of America. He has appealed to nationalism, engaged in blaming various ethnic and religious groups for America's, troubles and declared himself the solution to these troubles. It is said that Russia "hacked" the 2016 presidential election, that "hidden, racist voters" turned out to vote, and that the mass media has now "normalized" Trump and his offensive rhetoric and gave him billions in free advertisement.

 Whatever,,,Trump is now King of the United States...what is going to happen next with this American autocrat is anybody's guess. America has never had a real autocrat as president.

I told you all, on the various forums, to watch out for Russia and to not count Russia out in the international.system. The expansion of NATO to the borders of Russia, to include provocative air patrols, massive military maneuvers, and perhaps the stationing of nuclear missiles, are all actions that Russia must respond to for the protection of it's national security. Part of the blame for provoking Russia to take cyber-hacking to counter the perceived and real threats in its "near-abroad" can be laid at the feet of those East European leaders in Baltic countries and Poland too, and of the desire by neo-cons to dismember Russia?

Fuck the Baltic Air Policing!

Affecting Western national elections through cyber activities and "hacking," underhanded political and social attack messages, are sheer genius on the part of Putin and the Russians...and demonstrates that national security is about more than just military power.  They are also a statement that Russian concerns about activities related to NATO expansion and inclusion in a European security system should have been taken more seriously. Russian security needs should have also been a part of a European security system that includes Russia.   (see Senate Intel Report on Russian influence in 2016 election for more).

Expect increased violence and oppression from American police and oppression - including increased abuse of the labels "terrorism" and "anarchists" - against those who oppose government abuses from a Trump regime.  Expect so-called "Islamic extremism" to fuel more Islamophobia and ignore the fact that "Islamic terrorism" that is "inspired by ISIS" is nothing more than violent crimes by trouble individuals. We know that there is a different reaction from Western governments to violent crimes by non-Muslims (criminal justice) and violent crimes by criminals claiming some inspiration from "Islamic faith" (national security and oppression of the Islamic faith).   We can also expect increased spying, oppression and violence against Black activists opposing police violence, expanded abuse of the label "anarchists" by police to justify oppression and criminalization. Funny how support for Black Lives Matter "anarchists" include elected leaders and how the Movement has engaged in our democratic process for an end to police brutality against black people.. 

+++
Note: 1. I voted for Clinton and for Bernie Sanders in the Wisconsin Primary.  My views line up with Bernie Sanders the most, but Donald Trumps observations on the economic and social hardships faced by many  Americans rang true and were probably a main driver of his election. An autocrat like Trump does better appealing to those who are hurting, angry and in need of relief.  If Trump does not deliver, (and hateful nationalists never had good economic policies), he will be bounced out too...

Note 2. Russia Today (RT) is not "propaganda" anymore than CNN is "propaganda." The label "fake news" has been applied to just about any written and spoke word - including academic written works and peer-reviewed articles. RT has told the truth about the American life, especially the criminal justice system and the struggles of working people.  Sure, RT gets government funding, but CNN appeals to the US government for access to government leaders, including the US president.

Note 3. I will be blogging mostly at my Home Sweet Home blog and the topics will be short and varied.  I will be expressing my sympathies for Russia as well as outrage for possible Trump policies in other forums. I am both pro-Russia and anti-Trump.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Islamisation hysteria over gender seating at "speaking function" in the UK.

 There is a hate-inspired ruckus in the UK over demand of a hypothetical, orthodox Islamic speaker to "have his audience in a university lecture hall segregated by gender." You may read about this at the link above and provided [here - here] Those that promote Islamophobia and the Islamisation myth have likened this prospect of a gender segregated audience for a single speaker to South African Apartheid and the institution of segregation of black Americans in the American South.  These comparisons are outrageous given that this gender segregation was to be for one or a few hypothetical speakers at a public university -- while both South African Apartheid and racial segregation in the South were real institutionalized practices of inequality and dehumanization, often characterized by violence against the oppressed group.

 How are seating arrangements devaluing and dehumanizing one or both genders?

When asked the question about how gender segregation for a hypothetical single program means that some audience members are viewed as "less than" because of seating arrangements - the opponents on various forums simply could not answer. Most of the replies were based on the Islamification myth and the notion that Muslims are trying to take over the West (with help from the "godless" political left) and destroy Western Christian civilization and bring about some kind of a "global caliphate". A hypothetical Islamic "speaker" and his "demand" for gender seperation is yet another example of the "advancement of sharia law." The "imposition of sharia law on society" is a  part of the larger Islamisation mythology.  This stuff is very much, well, crackpot, and there are naive, very misinformed people are out there fighting something (Islamisation) that is not happening or occurring. This type of moral panic is (ab)used by deviant political actors (Geert Wilders and his PVV) to compromise the religious freedom of Muslims living in European countries. If anything, the growing institutional prejudice, discriminatory legislation, counter-terrorism practices and lack of equal protections of the laws are setting up an apartheid for Muslims living in Europe.

Reality check on the "apartheid" of the "gender segregation" hysteria. Some gender segregation is permitted for a religious group conducting a religious service. It is not permissible to gender segregate a lecture hall in a public university in a manner that implies inequality, and it should not be allowed, but it's possible and acceptable if there is NO implication of gender inequality. The gender separation could also be in the context of the program. The legality is determined on a case by case basis. That's a good balance, so comparisons to institutionalized oppression in South Africa and the American South are utterly outrageous, shameful, and should be apologized for by those abusing and cheapening the horrors of racial oppression. Here's a view from the Guardian about what is actually permissible:
It took the example of an ultra-orthodox religious group invited to speak as part of a wider series of talks on faith, where the speaker requested the audience be segregated by gender. The guidance says that if, for example, women and men were seated separately side by side rather than men at the front and women at the back there would not necessarily be any gender inequality, and voluntary segregation could be permitted (emphasis mine -The Guardian, 13 December 2013). 

What made racial segregation evil was that the "separate but equal" accommodation (Plessy v Ferguson,  1898) was not at all equal (Brown v. Board of Education, 1954), but institutionalized practices of inequality and dehumanization, often characterized by violence against the oppressed group..  Again - this is about promoting the myth of Islamisation and getting people emotional about something that is not happening or occurring...There can be NO simplistic comparisons between the evil and appalling institution of segregation in the American South and seating arrangements for a hypothetical  program - where the opponents cannot demonstrate how one gender is devalued and dehumanized to the extent of systematic dehumanization of black people in the American South.

What we need to watch closely now is if there is an attempt to now take this hysteria and use it to interfere with the religious practices of any religious group that has gender based religious practices, which also includes Christian faiths. Some of these hate groups that feed off of media attention to promote Islamophobia have been using the "sharia law threat" myth to try and interfere with religious practices of Muslims in their own communities. We must stop them from further interference in religious freedoms!

Well, in the end, we know what this hysteria is about ... promoting the myth of "Islamisation" ... getting people to fight something that's not occurring and will not happen. We know...this is "creeping sharia" and the "coming of the long Eurabian night" and, well, you all know the rest of the rubbish...xD

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Islamophobia as an international security problem

The West's religious and political extremists and radicals. While the focus is on the small number of Middle East religious radicals who are rioting in new Arab democracies,  the serious and growing threat from anti-Muslim radicals and Islamophobic extremists is multifaceted in nature. This threat ranges from free roaming violent radicals, like Anders Breivik and the English Defense League, to advances made by "political parties" in European nations, like Geert Wilders and the PVV.  All of this activity by Islamophobic radicals is well funded by wealthy, but equally radical Israeli interests, perhaps with the Likud Party.

We could have told you about the Islamophobic extremists and radical elements that are responsible for the creation of the "Innocence of Muslims" hate film - and it should be clear to the world now how dangerous these elements are.  What should be made clear to the world is how these Western extremists and radicals abuse their freedom of speech rights to provoke violence and international crisis.

Promotion of a  New World Order according to Samuel Huntington. There is going to have to be adjustments in foreign and security policies of national governments and in the policies of international organizations (like the European Union) to deal with this (not so new) anti-Muslim radical and Islamophobic extremist factor on the international community. The world community needs to anticipate that the element will abuse free speech rights to provoke trouble, just as Jyllands-Posten abused its free press rights when it published the "Danish cartoons" and when Geert Wilders and Theo van Gogh abused their free expression rights to make anti-Muslim hate films.

There are those people from largely the Anglo-American conservative right hope to stoke up another Cold War, this time between the West and the Islamic world. We can see their desired New World Order is along the lines of Samuel Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" thesis, or "Clash" thesis. Clash thesis is a world ordered along the "faultlines" between largely religiously based "civilizations."  We have the notion that Greece (and probably Serbia) are with "Orthodox civilization"  (watch for calls to throw Greece out of Europe - its the "Trojan horse" for Russia). We have the notion of "Confucian civilization" dominated by China. But - more importantly - we have "Islamic civilization" and "Western civilization."

The largely Anglo-American conservative ilk would like to maintain hostile relations with especially Muslim majority countries of "Islamic civilization." This level of hostile relations is supposed to replace the Soviet Union.  In the opening pages of his book Huntington argues that "enemies are essential to identity" and "hating what we are not is to love who we are."  America, according to Huntington, needs to look for monsters to slay in the Muslim world.

[youtube id="zl3YU5XcmVM" w="300" h="250"]

We have to realize that Islamophobia is present in Ray Kelly, the NYPD commissioner, as well as Geert Wilders, down to Robert Spencer.  Paul Ryan showed up at a "values summit" that was full of extremists, including Frank Gaffney.  So- Islamophobia is not just for the fringe, but has been allowed access to mainstream politics. Islamophobia is what much of Orthodox terrorism studies are based on, including the celebration of the discredited "NYPD radicalization model." We must deal with Islamophobia and those who wish to promote "Clash" thesis as some kind of New World Order. This world order divided by Islamophobia and "hate of others not like us" will be one that promotes constant conflict and crisis. We must work against it and favor a world system that strives to work on respect, mutual understanding and peace.

And - the promotion of Islamophobia and using it to sabotage America's relationships -- are un-American!

The "Muslim rage" was actually small.  We must first come to realize that only a small percentage of "Muslims" protested the "anti-Islam film." Some observers are of the opinion that the Western media needs to be more responsible when covering events in the Middle East -- and that the "Muslim rage" was exaggerated:

What is disheartening is that some of the media coverage of the protests embodies the worst form of sensational journalism. There were headlines and stories that made it seem as though millions of Muslims across the world had taken to the streets, with Muslim countries in riots and businesses closed.



In Indonesia, a nation of over 200 million, several hundred people took part in protests. Just a few months ago, 50,000 Indonesians bought tickets to see a Lady Gaga concert before it was canceled. So, what does this say about Muslims in Indonesia?

In Egypt, a nation of over 80 million, about 2,000 people protested on Friday. Of those protesters, a few hundred were arrested by the police.

In Lebanon, no protests occurred until Monday. Why? Because the pope had been visiting the country, and the leader of Hezbollah, which the U.S. has labeled as a terrorist group, didn't want to do anything to interfere with the pope's historic three-day visit.

A small number of protesters should not define the entire Muslim population of over a billion. The media should know this and report the truth accordingly.

The U.S. media -- and we're not just talking about Newsweek or Joe Scarborough -- need to act in a more responsible way. It appears that our media are more focused on ratings than facts and accuracy. While the media jump on the story and then quickly move on to another story, their impact in defining a people and a culture can be lasting. Let's hope the wave of #MuslimRage responses prompts the media to think twice before they react.


There are now those in acedemics who work with statistics and who are now assessing just how many took part in "Muslim rage" riots. The numbers are small - by the exaggerating of the size and scope of the protests shows how irresponsible the Western mass media can be, and future reports are forthcoming.  Given that these riots were - indeed - small, Islam had nothing to do with these small riots and Muslims are not collectively to blame for violence!

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="500" caption=""Muslim rage" riots were small. People are currently studying the size of them."][/caption]

The need now to calculate Islamophobia into foreign and security policies. In terms of security, there should be NO reaction of Western agencies to "Muslim rage," since the riots and protests were actually very small. But - we will see some call by Western security agencies (there might have already) to "look out for lone wolf jihadists upset over this video." What a load of poppycock!

In terms of security, it is the promotion of Islamophobia by various actors that needs to be calculated into the foreign and security policies nations and international actors. It should be clear to the world that Islamophobia is now a global problem, and has been for some time.  We must realize that those that promote Islamophobia and create Islamophobic media do so with the hope of sabotaging relationships between especially the US and the "Muslim world."  This film and its publication in Egypt may have served the purpose of dividing Egypt and the Middle East world from a growing relationship with the US and the Western world. The other purpose of giving this film publicity was to destabilize young and vulnerable Arab democracies.

So - the need here is to immunize the growing relationships between young Middle East countries and Western nations, the US and the European Union.

Islamophobia used as a dividing tool by radical right-wing political leaders, media pundits and fringe groups alike will have to be calculated into foreign and security policies of states and international organizations. Governments and political leaders should adapt the mentality of building positive relationships with the Arab and Muslim countries that are based on respect and mutual understanding - and this can only be done through a long-term relationship with Arab and Muslim countries based on respect and mutual understanding.  Western nations, the US and European Union, should continue to work with and support young Arab democracies and work to immunize the relationships against those who wish to use Islamophobia to sabotage relationships, just as al-Qaeda elements work to sabotage relationships.

We should also work to make Islamophobia in the media just as taboo in Western society as anti-semitism and racism.  This is happening, but slowly, and those who promote Islamophobia are well funded and sometimes well connected (Geert Wilders and Frank Gaffney). Governments should take courage to form public and private partnerships to combat Islamophobia -- and private groups should be made ready for action in the form of letter writing and boycotts of those who are are involved in the promotion of Islamophobic speech.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Freedom of speech and the 'Bedreigen Wilders' speech crime - future projects

In that aftermath of the "Innocence of Muslims" hate film as "freedom of speech" an opportunity has now opened to demonistrate the hypocracies of the Western notions of what is freedom of speech and what is speech crime.  We now accept the notion that radical anti-Muslim and Islamophobic extremists can make videos that cause an international crisis, while it is strafbaar to make anti-Wilders videos in the Netherlands where one must face the rechtbank for the bedreigen Wilders speech crime.

...and as is typical with "Muslim control" in the Netherlands - everything is shamefully justified -SURPRISE! SURPRISE! - from narrative of the murders of "Pim and Theo."

[youtube id="5VHP6iVIUwo" w="300" h="300"] [youtube id="QIKaM4EuFRg" w="300" h="300"]

We know that this American extremists who made the anti-Muslim hate film  (some are also backers of Wilders) claim "freedom of speech," but their record is that they are actually opposed to freedom and liberty for their critics and opponents. Geert Wilders in the Netherlands trampled over the freedom of speech of his critics and people have been prosecuted criminally for speech crimes against Geert Wilders. In the video above, a Rotterdam rapper is getting straf (punishment) for creating a bedreigen Wilders (to threaten Wilders) video. I will be working on a full academic paper (in PDF also) about those victims who have been persecuted for this speech crime (and I may even try to contract some of these victims) and post some of their videos...

Crazy religious extremist talk is also freedom of speech!!! The are also a couple of goofy groups running around Belgium and the Netherlands calling themselves "Sharia4Holland" and "Sharia4Belgium." Most people laugh at these loud and obnoxious groups as they shout how much they'd like sharia for their countries (not likely to ever happen).

[youtube id="hMK34cG80eA" w="300" h="300"]

As a (near) flaunt speaker of Dutch, I can understand about 85% of what this fellow is saying. People DO have the freedom of speech to talk crazy and talk about sharia and the economic crisis in our streets! I applaud these religious zealot-nutcases for their courage!  BLIJVEN PRATEN!  Deze zijn je mensenrechten!

Now - this fellow above was fined 450 euro for his speech crime against Cry Baby Geert Wilders (the real juvenile delinquent here) - an act of speech crime that is actually harmless compared to the anti-Islam film that has deliberately cause harm between the US and the Arab world.Shouting that you want sharia law to rule in Belgium and the Netherlands should not - in a democratic and free societyNEVER warrant any national security investigations, or intelligence spying, having your bank accounts sifted ----- let allow charges for a criminal act. However - knowing the AIVD (Dutch intelligence service) like I do, this is no laughing matter. The AIVD is as genuinely Islamophobic of an organization as one can imagine, and I suspect the AIVD uses the discredited NYPD  "radicalization model"- and given this assumption - the fellow and his friends have probably been labeled as "radicalized Muslims" a long time ago.

Not all 'threats' should be viewed as legitimate. Usually, but never the case with the bedreigen Wilders speech crime, what is a legitimate crime is weighted against the ability to carry out a threat. The fellow has no ability to harm Geert Wilders as much as getting his sharia law dreams for Europe. We must realize that this fellow  simply has no means with which to carry out his threats against Wilders.  These public statements being heard by people in the street have the appearance of street theater, not actual threats to take action against Wilders.

If somebody wanted to actually harm Wilders, he would not tell people in such a public place and he would be an expert assassin, and such an expert assassin would not waste his time on Wilders. It is highly likely that al-Qaeda has higher value targets than Geert Wilders.  So, we should see the occasional reports of "somebody threatened Wilders oh my" as childish methods to bring about social control of Muslims and justify the speech crime of bedreigen Wilders. We know that  Geert Wilders in the Netherlands trampled over the freedom of speech of his critics and people have been prosecuted criminally for speech crimes against Geert Wilders.

Geert Wilders has NO claim to be some "protector of freedom of speech!"

In reality, it's the AIVD that is becoming quite radical and this intelligence agency works against freedom of speech (as well as other freedoms) for Muslim citizens. I have some projects for the future that are going to expose the AIVD and the Dutch counter-terrorism unit NCTb and their brand of Islamophobic bullshit to the free world. In reality, AIVD needs something else better to do than Muslim social control!

Here's an ad from the CDA political party against the PVV and Wilders that avoided the prospect of criticizing Wilders as "threatening him."  Yet - is it good that child actors had to be out through this?

[youtube id="jht-LQCozB4" w="300" h="300"]

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Islam is not to blame for Middle East violence; free speech also applies to Muslims

Islamophobic radicals and extremists provoke violence, they find it fun. Like the hate merchants that they are, this violence in Yemen,  Egypt and the murders in Libya are partly to be blamed on those Islamophobic radicals and extremists who produced this video in the first place.  These radicals know full well what they are doing - and what the results would be - and it is right that good people everywhere condemn them and their "free speech." These radicals get some kind of twisted pleasure out of provoking other radical and extremists in the Middle East - and who created this outrageous movie is also a mystery, but it's believed to be a person by the name of Sam Bacile,  a Coptic Christian.



Now - while they argue that these hate merchants have "freedom of speech and expression" - let us first talk about also those in the Western world, living among Western security and police forces, who do not have the same level of "free speech" as these video producers. As I have written here before, if you wear a beard, robes, become a devout Muslim and express so-celled "anti-Western views"  - all supposedly protected by the First Amendment and the ECHR - YOU will be branded as "radicalized" and place on watchlists, watched by police and intelligence services, which could also include tampering with your freedom of movement, especially in the use of passenger air travel. [Faulty and biased terrorism studies field behind NYPD’s radicalization model].

No religious Muslim expressing "anti-Western views" should be placed on a watchlist anymore than this film-maker should be placed on a watchlist.

The provocation of violence when it is known that violence will occur - is never allowed from either the political Left, as well as Muslim communities - yet these producers of this knowingly proactive film have caused riots. As of now, it should be suspected that at least al-Qeada elements wanted to attack our embassy in Libya on the anniversary of September 11th - and the upheavel over the "Innocence of Muslims" video may have been used as cover and a coincidence. There may be elements of Gadaffi's army that may have participated in this attack against our embassy. [ Libya pledges to help US catch American officials' killersEgypt's Mursi condemns embassy attack, protesters clash ] "Western partner" Turkey also condemned the violence:
"Turkey has consistently emphasised that terror has no religion or nationality, and is a crime against humanity. Turkey continues to believe that the effective combating of terrorism requires the unity and the solidarity of the international community."

We must understand that Islam is not responsible for these murders and Muslims are not collectively guilty.  The fact remains that the violence is a from a few people in the country - and not accepted by governments or the larger public.  The majority of Libyans are outraged by the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and the three other Americans. Hundreds of Libyans turned out to protest against terrorism in their countryMohamed Magariaf, the Libyan President, is involved in finding the perpetrators.

What Arab and Muslim countries can and must do - fight for human rights for Muslims. It would be a better project, as I have said before, for Arab and Muslims nations to engage in the first for human rights and religious freedoms for Muslims living in the Western world. This is actually a better alternative that taking away anybody's freedom of speech. What is also possible is for pressure to be placed on YouTube (a private entity) to remove this video and create posting policies the prevent the posting of this type of proactive videos that are bigoted, hateful and cause violence. Those of use who use Internet services like YouTube know that there are policies against bigotry, hate and violence - and perhaps thsi video should have been removed. We know that often these services are slow and non-responsive to users who violate Term of Use policies.

"Western partner" Turkey really needs to step up and speak out in the OSCE and CoE against the civil rights and human rights abuses against Muslims by Western security and law enforcement. It is actually a better fight to fight for equal speech, political and religious rights that allowed this film to be posted without ramifications against the film-makers. It is a better fight to fight back against biased TSA agents, biased law enforcement training materials, abolition of the NYPD "radicalization model." It is a better fight to fight for freedom for Muslims than fight to restrict the freedoms of others.

 

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Arabic Music on a Spanish Airbus




Arabic music on a Spanish Airbus airliner - another case of Islamophobic insanity in Dutch security. Well a couple of days ago, the crew of a Spanish Airbus bound for Amsterdam were slow to respond to the control tower. When the crew did respond - there was the frightening sound of Arabic music in the background. Well - the goofy Dutch sent up F16 fighter jets to escort the Spanish Airbus to the ground.

The past Islamophobic insanity of Dutch intelligence and security apparatus. As I have demonstrated here on this blog [ see below ] Dutch intelligence and security(AIVD and NCTb) in the area of "counter-terrorism" is actually about the maintenance of the myth of "jihad in the Netherlands, with much of this myth built on the murder of Theo van Gogh.  The other task of the Dutch apparatchiks is to help facilitate social control of Muslims and Left-leaning groups that especially support asylum seekers.  After all, de kogel kwam bij de linkerkant (the bullet came form the left), as the political Left is responsible for the murder of "Pim," just as  Moroccan-Muslim community is responsible for the murder of "Theo."

But - another major use of the Dutch apparatchiks, the Dutch Ghostbusters, is to keep the Dutch people scared - so they learn to forget their great national traditions of religious tolerance and peaceful, pillarized pluralism. According to the new and deviant national myths being forced upon the Dutch people - tolerance is culpable for the murders of these "Dutch heroes."

Last May we had the out pouring of sympathy from the Dutch people (those that still understand what being Dutch is really about) for the plight of Somali and other asylum seekers across the Netherlands. This out pouring of sympathy was quickly followed by a story that a BBC journalist in Somalia had met with an al-Shabaab fighter and this fighter told the BBC that "there were terror cells in Western countries, including the Netherlands." This latest episode of Arabic music on a Spanish Airbus airliner causing a "security crisis" can be viewed as yet another on of these false flags- perhaps intended to promote fear and prop up Islamophobia in the Netherlands.

We can see where the Dutch get their fantasies of "jihadist terrorism" - and the whole of the Dutch intelligence and security apparatchik engages in this perverted form of Islamophobia. Discourse analysis is a useful means and method of examining the Islamophobic insanity behind Dutch intelligence and security. Despite the lack of evidence of  "jihad networks" and "international al-Qeada terrorist networks" - those that want to frighten and engage in spread Islamophobia in Dutch society continue to put up these false flags "terrorist threats in the Netherlands" - but with no real proof that there is a real terrorist threat.

Among other very important Islamophobic things - it is highly suspected that the Dutch security apparatchiks use the biased and discredited NYPD "radicalization model."  We can certainly suspect that there is a "Mohammed Bouyeri" profile used to sift the Moroccan community for intelligent, and faithful Muslim boys that do well in school - never mind that such young men can contribute to Dutch society.

The maintenance of fear in the Dutch people is also purpose of the activities of Dutch security apparatchiks. Pim Fortuyn was an expert at keeping the Dutch people scared. It was his stock and trade to scare the Dutch people away from the pride of their national identity.

Again - there is a high prospect that the murder of Theo van Gogh was just a murder by a street gang member - not an actually terrorist attack by "an al-Qeada network." We see from this latest episode the kind of mileage that turning the murder of "Theo" into a "terrorist attack in Amsterdam" gets...more of the same fear creation ...

Remember this: There is NO evidence that there is an organized and wide spread effort for "jihad in the Netherlands" except in the minds of Dutch security apparatchiks - the Ghostbusters of the Netherlands.

We can also expect more of this type of phony Islamophobic "jihad in the Netherlands" threat as the September 12 elections loom -m it is an effort to keep fear in the minds of the Dutch people and prop up Islamophobic discourses.



Arabische muziek op een Spaanse Airbus - Het bewijs dat Nederlandse veiligheid volkomen krankzinnig is!

De Nederlandse Ghostbusters buste Arabisch "moslim" muziek op een Spaanse Airbus! Ja - misschien is het een jihad spook!- ja - de Nederlandse veiligheid zijn krankzinnig islamofoben! Wel een paar dagen geleden, de bemanning van een Spaanse Airbus op weg naar Amsterdam waren traag om te reageren op de verkeerstoren. Toen de bemanning reageerde - was er het angstaanjagende geluid van Arabische muziek op de achtergrond. Nou - de goofy Nederlandse stuurde F16 straaljagers aan de Spaanse Airbus begeleiden naar de grond.

De afgelopen islamofobe waanzin van Nederlandse inlichtingen-en veiligheidsapparaat. Zoals ik hier laten zien op deze blog [zie hieronder] Nederlandse inlichtingen-en veiligheidsdiensten (AIVD en NCTb) op het gebied van "terrorismebestrijding" is eigenlijk over het onderhoud van de mythe van de "jihad in Nederland," en met deze mythe gebouwd op de moord op Theo van Gogh. De andere taak van de Nederlandse apparatsjiks is om sociale controle van moslims en linkse groepen  te ondersteunen asielzoekers te vergemakkelijken. Immers, "de kogel kwam bij de linkerkant," als de politieke linkse is verantwoordelijk voor de moord op "Pim", en de Marokkaanse moslimgemeenschap is verantwoordelijk voor de moord op "Theo."

Maar - een andere belangrijke toepassing van de Nederlandse apparatsjiks, de Nederlandse Ghostbusters, is om het Nederlandse volk bang houden- zodat ze leren om hun grote nationale tradities van religieuze tolerantie en vreedzaam, verzuilde pluralisme vergeten. Volgens de nieuwe en afwijkende nationale mythen wordt opgedrongen het Nederlandse volk - tolerantie is schuldig aan de moord op deze 'Nederlandse helden. "

Afgelopen mei hadden we de uitstorting van sympathie van het Nederlandse volk (die nog te begrijpen wat het betekent om Nederlands echt om gaat) voor de benarde situatie van Somalische en andere asielzoekers in heel Nederland. Deze uitstorting van sympathie werd snel gevolgd door een verhaal dat een BBC-journalist in Somalië had ontmoet met een al-Shabaab vechter en deze vechter vertelde de BBC dat "er terreurcellen in de westerse landen, waaronder Nederland." Deze laatste aflevering van Arabische muziek op een Spaans Airbus vliegtuig veroorzaken van een "security crisis" kan worden gezien als weer een andere een van deze valse vlaggen, misschien bedoeld om angst te bevorderen en tot steun islamofobie in Nederland.

We kunnen zien waar de Nederlanders krijgen hun fantasieën over "jihadistisch terrorisme" - en het geheel van de Nederlandse inlichtingen-en veiligheidsdiensten apparatsjik houdt zich bezig met deze perverse vorm van islamofobie. Discoursanalyse is een nuttig middel en de methode van onderzoek van de islamofobe waanzin achter Nederlandse inlichtingen-en veiligheidsdiensten. Ondanks het gebrek aan bewijs van 'jihad-netwerken "en" internationale al-Qeada terroristische netwerken "- degenen die willen bang maken en in verspreiding islamofobie nemen aan de Nederlandse samenleving verder op te zetten deze valse vlaggen" terroristische dreigingen in Nederland "- maar met geen echt bewijs dat er sprake is van een terroristische dreiging.

Onder andere zeer belangrijke islamofobe dingen - is het sterk vermoeden dat de Nederlandse veiligheid apparatsjiks de bevooroordeelde en in diskrediet NYPD gebruikt "radicalisering model." We kunnen zeker vermoeden dat er sprake is van een "Mohammed Bouyeri" profiel wordt gebruikt om de Marokkaanse gemeenschap te ziften voor intelligente en trouwe moslim jongens die het goed doen op school - never mind dat zulke jonge mannen kan bijdragen aan de Nederlandse samenleving.

Het onderhoud van angst in de Nederlandse bevolking is ook het doel van de activiteiten van het Nederlandse veiligheidsbeleid apparatsjiks. Pim Fortuyn was een expert op het houden van het Nederlandse volk bang. Het was zijn voorraad en de handel aan het Nederlandse volk weg te jagen van de trots van hun nationale identiteit.

Alweer - is er een grote kans dat de moord op Theo van Gogh was gewoon een moord door een straat bendelid - ". Een al-Qeada netwerk" geen daadwerkelijk terroristische aanslag door We zien uit deze laatste aflevering van het soort kilometers dat het draaien van de moord op "Theo" in een "terroristische aanslag in Amsterdam" krijgt ... meer van hetzelfde angst creatie ...

Onthoud dit: Er is geen bewijs dat er sprake is van een georganiseerde en breed verspreid inspanning voor "jihad in Nederland", behalve in de hoofden van de Nederlandse veiligheid apparatsjiks - de Ghostbusters van Nederland.

We kunnen ook meer verwachten van dit soort nep-islamofobe 'jihad in Nederland' dreiging als van 12 september verkiezingen loom-m is het een poging om angst te houden in de hoofden van de Nederlandse bevolking en het faillissement van islamofobe discours.



See also/zie ook

Nationaal Coördinator Tahmilahbestrijding en Veiligheid

Faulty and biased terrorism studies field behind NYPD’s radicalization modelDefecte en bevooroordeeld terrorisme studies veld achter NYPD radicalisering model

Terror cells in the Netherlands? BULLCRAP! AIVD show us the evidence!Terror-cellen in Nederland? AIVD waar is het bewijs!

De politie machtsmisbruik in New York met CIAGhostbusting in Nederland

Nederlandse en Amerikaanse gebruik van de islamitische “Radicalisering”Questioning Dutch and American uses of Muslim “Radicalization”

Books / Boeken

John Mueller - Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them

Michael Barkun - Chasing Phantoms: Reality, Imagination, and Homeland Security Since 9/11

Sunday, July 22, 2012

One year after Breivik and nothing has changed

















[caption id="attachment_2267" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Breivik: A terrorist and enemy to Western democracy and freedom!"]Anders Behring Breivik[/caption]















Norway after Breivik. It was one year ago when right-wing terrorist, Anders Behring Breivik, committed the "twin terrors" on his own nation of Norway. "The bomb and the shots were intended to change Norway. People responded by embracing our values. He failed, the people won" said Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. Rather than allow the tolerance and democratic society of Norway to change, Norwegians have embraced more democracy and values of openness.  In his "sanity trial" Breivik rants about the court in which he is being tried as "supporting multiculturalism," and therefore "illegitimate."   What the so-called "terrorism experts" in Western security, intelligence and law enforcement fail - utterly - to realize is that Breivik and his sympathizers are actually opponents and enemies of their own liberal democratic nations, they are also enemies of freedom, individual liberty, as well as equality before the law and the rule of law in liberal democratic nations. Breivik and those of his ilk are anti-democratic  and have placed themselves as enemies of Western liberal democracy!

[youtube id="VoiXqU_NgxE" w="250" h="250"] [youtube id="HiSM6obdlMQ" w="250" h="250"]

Yet - Norway has now taken the footsteps of anti-Muslim, oriented counter-terrorism in outlawing "training in a terrorist camp" (what ever that means) - while Breivik never "trained in terrorist camp."  This is a sure sign that we are back to the notion that Muslim communities are "threatening," even in Norway. Yes - one year after Breivik mercilessly butchered teenagers at the Utøya summer camp - Western security, intelligence and law enforcement act as if Norway, July 22, 2011 never happened - or was not as bad as it really was - compared to the mere presence of bearded, dark-skinned Muslims with loud, "anti-Western views" living in their own "suspect communities" in our countries.

Right-eye blindness continues to be a real problem with Western security. In other European countries, "political leaders" holding Breivik's views sit in parliaments and in security and intelligence agencies. Breivik and his sympathizers have nothing to fear from Western security, intelligence and police agencies, in contrast to outspoken Muslims and the political left engaging in legally protected speech acts, the targets of Breivik terrorism. "Terrorism" continues to be something that only Muslims do and violent criminal acts by suspects of a Muslim background are now "lone-wolf jihad."  Violence and suspicion of violence by Muslims is still viewed, in a discriminatory and Islamophobic sense, as more dangerous than the prospect (or likelihood) of another Norway attack. We still see discourses out of agencies, like Europol and the Dutch AIVD, that actually downplay the attacks in Norway and the security threat from the radical, dangerous European right-wing.

Over this past year, we have seen the unchecked growth of the radical, and possibly dangerous right, with several violent acts by members of the English Defense League, the most serious threat to the security of the UK. A couple of weeks ago, and EDL member was sentenced to prison for a knife attack on his neighbors. This week convictions were secured against EDL members for breaking the jaw of a Muslim man who was attacked while walking near his home with his brother.

In November, we have learned of the killings of mainly Turkish shopkeepers in Germany by the National Socialist Underground and that German intelligence may have know about this terrorist group.  As I have demonstrated, German intelligence has a blind right eye, as the victims of the NSU are Muslims and, therefore, "deserving victims." The NSU was believed to have carried out the murders of nine shopkeepers between 2000 and 2007 and a nail bomb attack against Cologne’s Turkish community. There was a German intelligence officer known as “little Adolf” who was believed to be present, or at least nearby, when one of the murders took place. This right-wing terrorist group was allowed to terrorize at liberty because, as I demonstrate, some in Germany police and intelligence may have viewed the Turkish-Muslim victims as "deserving victims" and not deserving of equal police protection.

"Terrorism" that is viewed as acceptable by a larger society (terrorism against Muslim communities) tends to provide tacit support for the terrorist groups that perpetrate terrorist violence against "deserving victims." The reality is that the EDL is the Number One threat to the security of the United Kingdom, yet, we still see Muslims "arrested" under the so-called "Terrorism Act" of the UK - which - as in the Netherlands - appears to be a law that only Muslims can be charged with ...


Yes - police DO, indeed, make up "terrorist plot" evidence. We know how British police made up "evidence" against a graduate student of terrorism studies, Rizwaan Sabir, at Nottingham University and levied  accusations of a "terrorism plot" (yep - here we go). Sabir obtained a document about al-Qaeda terrorism from a US government website. It's not what happened to the student, who was also being slandered  by Nottingham University - but what happened to his professor, Rod Thornton, a former intelligence officer in the British Army and terrorism expert, who became outraged by the student's treatment by British police.  Professor Thornton spoke out and authored a paper about the ill treatment his student received from British police - and was essentially persecuted and punished (in violation of academic freedom rights) for his noble efforts. Professor Thornton said of the ordeal he and his student were put through by British police:
"The police were totally unprofessional. After their mistakes they tried to cover them up. I've seen some altered police notes, I've seen evidence made up. The whole thing seems to be a complete tissue of lies, starting from the cover up of their mistakes in the first place."

"What should raise alarm bells is how and why the police think it is acceptable to make up information to send innocent Muslims to prison as terrorists. The onus is now on the IPCC to conduct a full and proper investigation into this matter."

Even after the the lies of the British police were exposed, Rizwaan Sabir continued to be stopped and has been stopped numerous times since his 2008 "arrest."
In June 2011 for the Equality and Human Rights Commission found that “for some Muslims, these stops have become a routine part of their travel experience, and that―this power is silently eroding Muslim communities ‘trust and confidence in policing.’”

Those on the receiving end of Schedule 7 stops report: intrusive questioning over social, religious and political views or community activities; the taking of their bio-data despite not being under arrest; officers refusing to wait the arrival of a solicitor before conducting the search and questioning; the stress caused to the person stopped and to those travelling with them, as they worry about missing flights or losing baggage; and the seizure of mobile phones and credit cards.

And - do they seriously think this tyrannical and utterly useless busy-work is  "keeping us safe from terrorism?" What rubbish! What outrage! How stupid! How counter-productive!!!

[youtube id="nKsFQYGiqGE" w="250" h="250"] [youtube id="ZUK1KsrcttQ" w="250" h="250"]

Well - this week we were shown just how safe the "counter-terrorism practice" in the Western world keeps us. Unless you were sleeping in a cave this week, you know that there was the massacre at a movie theater in Colorado. The accused in is James Holmes a white, upper-income "good kid" - non-Muslim- which is what makes him totally undetectable for "terrorist activity."   Holmes is a brilliant  bomb-maker as he was a neurobiology student - as he booby-trapped his apartment so well that police bomb experts had to do a lot of careful work to defuse his handiwork.  Holmes was described as having ordered 6000 rounds of ammunition from the Internet. Where did he get his ballistic vest, helmet and the smoke grenades?  Isn't James Holmes a terrorist who perpetrated a terrorist attack - in a "Mumbai style" of shooting people with firearms in a movie theater?

Nope - as the saying goes: Not a Muslim, not a terrorist!

[caption id="attachment_3589" align="alignright" width="150" caption="Holmes: Not a Muslim, not a terrorist!"][/caption]

Western counter-terrorism efforts continue to be backwards oriented and utterly useless in protecting us. There is plenty of other evidence that Western security and counter-terrorism efforts have forgotten about Norway and have gone back to chancing the phantoms of "Islamists and jihadists" - and perhaps fabricating evidence or exaggerating "terrorist plots."   In fact - it is quite arguable that the Western security and law enforcement agencies charged with protecting us from real terrorism are utterly useless and serve as nothing more than agencies to chill religious freedom and speech of Muslims and the political Left.

If the victims of terrorism are Muslims or their "leftist allies" - then this is hardly "terrorism," but something else less than "terrorism" - as Muslims and the "leftist allies" are deserving victims of "terrorism."

Yes --- what we don't hear about the Colorado movie theater murderer is the T-word, either in the media or from the FBI. Mohammad... uhhh ... James Holmes is a brilliant bomb maker and in the spread of his message - what ever message that is supposed to be. But - wait - what if the alleged killer's name was Mohammad Holmes? Why - we'd be talking about "possible links to al-Qaeda" and Holmes "radicalization process." We'd also hear about "radical imans" and "lone wolf jihad." Since James Holmes is a "good" -  white - upper-class kid and non-Muslim (like Breivik) he cannot possibly be branded as a "terrorist" and his killings at the movie theater are never "terrorism."  "Terrorism" is something only Muslims do...just ask any terrorism expert in any Western security and intelligence agency.

See/zie:

Trying to Forget Breivik: One Year After the Norway Massacre

Utoya remembers one year after Anders Behring Breivik massacre

Norway tries to put pain of Breivik behind year on

Anders Behring Breivik

A year after Breivik's massacre, Norway tightens antiterror laws

Rod Thornton's suspension is a serious attack on academic freedom

Sabir on Security | Police fabricated evidence against me but civil liberties concern us all

 

Monday, July 9, 2012

Muslim round ups in the UK ahead of Games

[caption id="attachment_3549" align="alignleft" width="206" caption="Why the way he's dressed and his obnoxious views - he must be planning a terrorist attack!"][/caption]

British police have no idea what a "dangerous individual" looks like, but think it looks like a Muslim. There is NO better demonstration of the dubious security, intelligence and police "work" than what we are currently seeing in the UK in the run up to the Olympic Games.  We see round ups of Muslim individuals on rather dubious "terrorist plots" while members of the English Defense League (EDL) remain highly radicalized and dangerous - and on the loose in the community.

At the same time, a member of the English Defense was sentenced to 9 years in prison for a knife attack against his neighbors ... we have round ups of Muslims with dubious and questionable police and intelligence work ... including accusations of unstated "terrorist plots" ... while the EDL remains at large to carry out violent "demos" against communities through out Britain.

The real threat to British security does not come from the Muslim community, but from the EDL, however, to the British police and MI5, a "dangerous terrorist" has nothing to do with an actual plot of real violence- but what a religious Muslim says and how the religious Muslim dresses. If actually plots of real terrorism were the goal of British security and intelligence - members of the EDL would have been put in prison a long time ago.

The "arrest" for "terrorism" appears to fit the NYPD profile: It is now criminal in the UK and elsewhere to appear as a devout Muslim with "anti-Western views." A devout Muslim who is outspoken and politically active, but a lacks a real "terrorism plot,"  is viewed as "radicalized" and is a "criminal."  As  I have predicted, the NYPD profile is now being used to arrest people for both their religious devotion and their political and social views. When we take a look at the articles over this "plot" we see very little evidence of violent planning, and this means justification for their arrests are probably based on legally protected religious and political viewpoints.   When we see the picture of Richard Dart above - we see the same long beard and dress that was highlighted in the NYPD "profile" - but these are legally protected activities and not "dangerous" and "violent."

We see that Richard Dart is a Muslim convert who adapted "anti-Western" views, and said that he would encourage others to go to Afghanistan to fight against British troops.

My response is sooooooooooo what! Such a statement is highly offensive - but these are words - not actions or behaviour!  Words are not bombs! Show us the evidence - as all we have are statements from police and government. So far - from current reports - Richard Dart does not appear to have engaged in ANY criminal activity!

Richard Dart should have the right to his religious freedom and freedom of speech - including obnoxious view - and be free from this kind of UK government harassment. "Extremist views" are not grounds for arrest and prosecution in  democratic societies with individual liberty. The manner of one's dress and speech maybe unusual and obnoxious, but people living in democratic societies with individual liberty - have a right to their manner of dress and views - without harassment of the likes of Scotland Yard and  MI5. UK Muslims now live in fear, thanks to British unchecked Islamophobia as "free speech" and personal abuse of Muslims now includes having their doors smashed in by British police:
Have you ever been called an Islamist? How about a jihadist or a terrorist? Extremist, maybe? Welcome to my world. It's pretty depressing. Every morning, I take a deep breath and then go online to discover what new insult or smear has been thrown in my direction. Whether it's tweets, blogposts or comment threads, the abuse is as relentless as it is vicious.

To say that I find the relentlessly hostile coverage of Islam, coupled with the personal abuse that I receive online, depressing is an understatement. There have been times – for instance, when I found my wife curled up on our couch, in tears, after having discovered some of the more monstrous and threatening comments on my New Statesman blog – when I've wondered whether it's all worth it. Perhaps, a voice at the back of my head suggests, I should throw in the towel and go find a less threatening, more civilised line of work. But that's what the trolls want. To silence Muslims; to deny a voice to a voiceless community. I shouldn't have to put up with this abuse. But I will. I have no plans to let the Islamophobes win. So, dare I ask: who's with me?

The "arrest" of Richard Dart and his friends shows that European security and intelligence remain focused on largely made up threats from the Muslim community - while highly dangerous and radicalized members of threat groups, like the EDL, do not get the same treatment police gave to  Richard Dart.  There needs to be a growing protest against this type of tyrannical and abusive police and security activity - along the lines of religious and political rights, human rights, the Universal Declaration of Human rights, as well as the European Conventions - and there needs to be some kind of world protest against these dubious and outrageous activities by the British State.

We need to start to realize that much of Western police and security, post-September 11, does very little to protect Western society from actual terrorist threat - note the attacks in Norway, July 22, 2011 and the Doner murders in Germany - and serve more as a tyrannical form of Muslim community control and to put on a brutal show to the rest of the world.

Now - last question: What makes the United Kingdom no better than rogue regimes, like Cuba, which also "arrests" its "troublemakers" before high profile events?

Instead of being "impressed" with British security - we need to be outraged and take vigorous actions against British security!

 

---

See:

We mustn't allow Muslims in public life to be silenced

East London EDL supporter threatens Muslims

Mosque protest leader guilty

Man arrested after demo by South Wales National Front in Swansea

EDL thug gets 9 years in prison for racist attack on neighbours

More time for 'terror plot' quiz

6 Muslims arrested in UK terror raid near Olympic Stadium

Muslim arrested under anti-terror laws

White Muslim one of six arrested over ‘terror plot'

Police may be arresting marginal terror suspects to clear decks for Olympics says watchdog

ANTI-MUSLIM VIOLENCE: PICTURE ACROSS UK from TELL MAMA

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Terror cells in the Netherlands? BULLCRAP! AIVD show us the evidence!

[caption id="attachment_3461" align="alignleft" width="208" caption="AIVD: Handen af​​!"][/caption]

While many Dutch people expressed sympathy was for the Somali asylum seekers, the AIVD had yet another “terrorist alert.” In a “false flag” and faked “terror alert” fashion that we here in America know too well, the Dutch media posted a narrative about alleged Somali al-Shabaab terror cells in the US, Britain and the Netherlands.

Supposedly, a former al-Shabaab fighter, now with the army, told a BBC reporter in Somalia that there are al-Shabaab terror cells just waiting to spring, including in the Netherlands.  This former fighter, who vanished before he could be interviewed by intelligence agents, told the reporter that “al-Shabaab had recruited expatriate Somalis in Somalia and had trained them for terror attacks.” (Volkskrant)

Yea (roll your eyes!) right!

Now – a reality check. It has been widely reported that the BBC has engaged in this type of faked and false flag reports in the past. The FBI is well known to have paid informants. Was this fighter tortured or embellishing?  If there are terror cells in our countries, we should demand that they be arrested, but there is the greater chance that the “informant” was paid to say these things. Where are the arrests of the “terrorists” and where is the evidence? Before we allow intelligence and security agencies – like the AIVD – to run amuck among religious and ethnic minority communitieslet’s see the evidence!

Why the AIVD could be doing this…

  1. Muslim control. Remember,  this type of report also serves the political interests of some people in the Dutch State, and not just to justify the AIVD’s “Muslim control” activities.

  2. Maintaining the “jihad in the Netherlands” narrative. The creation of “terror alerts” by the elements of the Dutch State, as with “security interests” of all State governments serves some purpose of the State and/or its political apparatuses.

  3. FEAR! We can suspect that the purpose is to – as it has been in the Netherlands since the antics of Fortuyn, to create fear in the Dutch people.

  4. Justify surveillance. The purpose is to justify the surveillance of groups and individuals involved in efforts to help in Somali asylum seekers in the Netherlands. To further demonize and allow for police sweeps against the Somali asylum seekers.  After all, the AIVD is out to protect the Netherlands, or more likely, protect against “illegal persons.”

  5. Keep Wilders happy. To serve the political and social interests of various actors in Dutch State, including the PVV and others who want conflict with the Islamic “civilization.”


Sharia4Holland is not a “national security threat!” There is also the establishment of the Sharia4Holland – a rather obnoxious band of religious lunatics that is supported by nobody – into a “national security threat against the Netherlands."  The other day, a passerby was arrested for engaging a debate with this pack of lunatics when a supposed threat to Geert Wilders was uttered. Keep in mind that death threats can be uttered against left political figures, like Job Cohen - and nobody is arrested - even after Anders Breivik’s rampage in Norway last summer.  It’s “free speech” to threaten Left politicians, but a criminal act to threaten the radical right thug, Geert  Wilders. Free speech my ass!

Don’t believe it! Expect a report of the AIVD’s activities against Somali asylum seekers and that band of lunatics called Sharia4Holland. When we see these reports, we will then know that the purpose of the Dutch State’s security apparatus is more about “Muslim control” than real security work. There appears to still be a lot of interest of the Dutch State and its intelligence and security apparatuses in maintaining the “jihad in the Netherlands” narrative. Even the head loon of Sharia4Holland, who stated that Geert Wilders “should have learned from what happened to Theo van Gogh” is playing the AIVD’s game and echoing the “jihad in the Netherlands” narrative. What is probably true is that murder of “Theo” was by a street gang member, Mohammed Bouyeri, to serve the purposes of Mohammed Bouyeri. This includes advanced status among his criminal peers.

Yes – Geert Wilders will die someday! We will all die someday, but I hope that Wilders can turn his life around before then and realize that he is wasting his obvious talents pursuing hate and destroying his own country’s culture, traditions and national identity.  But – I suppose that someday Wilders will make a death bed confession that he was wrong and regrets his wasted political career. What a pity!

Well – I promise you that the AIVD’s activities will, indeed, be dissected this summer.  It will have a TOUGH discourse analysis! Sunlight is the best disinfectant against the toxic activities of the AIVD!

Terror-cellen in Nederland? AIVD waar is het bewijs!

Terwijl veel Nederlanders medeleven betuigd was voor de Somalische asielzoekers, de AIVD nog een "terroristische alert." Had in een "false flag" en nep "terreuralarm" mode die we hier in Amerika weten al te goed, de Nederlandse media berichten geplaatst verhaal over vermeende Somalische al-Shabaab terreurcellen in de Verenigde Staten, Groot-Brittannië en Nederland.

Vermoedelijk, een voormalige al-Shabaab vechter, nu met het leger, vertelde een BBC-verslaggever in Somalië dat er al-Shabaab terreurcellen gewoon wachten tot de lente, ook in Nederland. Deze voormalige strijder, die verdween voordat hij kon worden geïnterviewd door geheim agenten, vertelde de verslaggever dat "al-Shabaab had expatriate Somaliërs aangeworven in Somalië en had getraind ze voor terroristische aanslagen." (VK)

Ja (draai je ogen!) zeker!

Nu - een realiteit checkAlgemeen wordt gemeld dat de BBC is bezig met dit soort vervalste en valse vlag rapporten in het verledenDe FBI is bekend bij betaalde informanten te hebben. Was dit een vechter tourtured of verfraaien? Als er terreurcellen in onze landen, moeten we eisen dat ze worden gearresteerd, maar er is des te groter de kans dat de "informant" werd betaald om deze dingen te zeggen. Waar zijn de arrestatie van de 'terroristen' en waar is het bewijs? Voordat we laten inlichtingen-en veiligheidsdiensten - net als de AIVD - om hun hetze tussen religieuze en etnische minderheden - laten we eens kijken het bewijs!

Waarom de AIVD zou kunnen worden om dit te doen ...

1. Moslim controle. Vergeet niet dat dit type rapport dient ook de politieke belangen van sommige mensen in de Nederlandse Staat, en niet alleen te rechtvaardigen van de AIVD "moslim control"-activiteiten.
2. Het handhaven van de "jihad in Nederland" verhaal. De oprichting van "terreur alerts" door de elementen van de Nederlandse Staat, net als bij "veiligheidsbelangen" van alle nationale overheden dient een bepaald doel van de staat en / of haar politieke apparaten.
3. FEAR! We kunnen vermoeden dat het doel is om - zoals het is in Nederland sinds de capriolen van Fortuyn, om angst te scheppen in het Nederlandse volk.
4. Uitvullen bewaking. Het doel is om te rechtvaardigen de surveillance van groepen en individuen die betrokken zijn bij pogingen om te helpen bij Somalische asielzoekers in Nederland. Om verder te demoniseren en laat voor de politie sweeps tegen de Somalische asielzoekers. Immers, de AIVD is uit het beschermen van de Nederland, of meer waarschijnlijk, te beschermen tegen "illegale personen."
5. Houd Wilders blij. Om de politieke en sociale belangen van de verschillende actoren in de Nederlandse Staat, met inbegrip van de PVV en anderen die in strijd zijn met de islamitische dienen "beschaving."

Sharia4Holland is niet een "nationale bedreiging van de veiligheid!" Er is ook de behandeling van de Sharia4Holland - een nogal onaangename bende religieuze gekken die wordt ondersteund door niemand - in een "nationale veiligheid dreiging tegen Nederland." De andere dag werd een voorbijganger gearresteerd voor het aangrijpen van een debat met de verpakking van de gekken bij een veronderstelde bedreiging van Geert Wilders werd geuit. Houd er rekening mee dat de dood bedreigd kan worden uitgesproken tegen de linkse politieke figuren, zoals Job Cohen - en niemand is gearresteerd - zelfs na rooftocht in Noorwegen afgelopen zomer Anders Breivik's. Het is "vrije meningsuiting" naar links politici bedreigen, maar een strafbaar feit om de radicale rechts de schurken bedreigen, net als Wilders.

Geloof het niet! Verwacht je aan een verslag van de activiteiten van de AIVD tegen de Somalische asielzoekers en die band van de gekken genoemd Sharia4Holland. Wanneer we deze rapporten zien, zullen we dan weten dat het doel van de veiligheid van de Nederlandse Staat apparaat is meer over "moslim control" dan echte security werk. Er blijkt nog steeds veel belangstelling van de Nederlandse Staat en de inlichtingen-en veiligheidsdiensten apparaten in het handhaven van de "jihad in Nederland" verhaal. Zelfs het hoofd loon van Sharia4Holland, die verklaarde dat Geert Wilders "zou hebben geleerd van wat er met Theo van Gogh" speelt de AIVD spel en in navolging van de "jihad in Nederland" verhaal. Wat is waarschijnlijk waar is dat de moord op "Theo" was door een straatbende lid, Mohammed Bouyeri, de toepassing van Mohammed Bouyeri te dienen. Dit omvat geavanceerde status onder zijn criminele collega's.

Ja - Geert Wilders zal op een dag sterven! We zullen allemaal op een dag sterven, maar ik hoop dat Wilders kan zijn leven om te gooien voor die tijd en beseffen dat hij zijn talenten voor de hand liggende streven haat verspillen en het vernietigen van zijn eigen land de cultuur, tradities en nationale identiteit. Maar - ik veronderstel dat op een dag Wilders maakt een sterfbed bekentenis dat hij fout was en betreurt zijn verspilde politieke carrière. Wat jammer!



Nou - ik beloof je dat de AIVD activiteiten, inderdaad, worden ontleed deze zomer. Zonlicht is het beste ontsmettingsmiddel tegen giftige activiteiten van de AIVD!

 

Saturday, March 31, 2012

The French State and its abusive reactions to Toulouse shootings.

Going after the French State and its abusive response to the aftermath of the shooting by a "lone wolf," a lone gunman at Toulouse. The response of the French State is now one of an iron fist, which now includes "arrests" of "Islamists" in the phony problem of "Islamist network."  The misguided and anti-Muslim response to the shootings by a lone gunman, Mohamed Merah, also now include denying imams who have never preached violence entrance to the country for an annual Islamic Conference.

There is now the added element of the French elections and Sarkozy is looking for a bump in the polls. Sarkozy has traveled the road of persecution of with regard to the Roma which was followed by a rebuke from the European Union. The French State responded in a positive manner when it came to the presence of the Roma - it is unbelievable how the EU cannot come to the rescue of Muslim EU citizens that have to endure post-violence attacks on human rights and civil freedoms.

Islamist networks and the "threat" is probably a made up "threat." We now seen the "arrests" is "Islamists" by the French State. If these "Islamist networks" were such a danger - then why not close them down before this "lone wolf" shooting? It is quite possible that the people being arrested are being arrested for their religious faith and perhaps their political opinions - not their actual threat of "terrorism." These arrests, including of Merah's mother - should be closely followed by European and international human rights institutions.

Much to their credit, French police now believe that Mohamed Merah was not some "al-Qeada mission" - but was quite alone in his actions. That is not hard to understand, as anybody can claim to be an "al-Qeada operative" and this has been done by individuals in the past. Yet - we see the usual dubious claim of "an Islamist network" and the usual "clash of civilizations" response in collectively blame and punishment of the entire Muslim community. This misguided response is something we simply do not see against radical right networks, but only with "Islamist networks" (which may be nothing more that religious study groups. Expect Rob Wainwright and his Europol to explot the notion of "Islamist networks." Yes - I hope that "Islamist networks" do exist and that the limit their activity to discussion only.

In fact - now we are finding out that the Islamist group - the members that have now been arrested - had NO connection to Mohamed Merah. So - why on God's Green Earth are they being arrested?! What of THEIR freedom of expression and religion? What are the French State's obligations to the human rights of the Knights of Pride Islamist group!

That we will study...

That we will learn about...

That we will raise awareness about!

In a the ideal world, the French State lets the members of the Knights of Pride  go and leaves then alone - or suffers international rebuke and consequense for its actions against the Knights of Pride Islamist group as it did in its actions against Roma people!

So - some people like al-Qaeda  - so what - liking al-Qaeda has nothing to do with a person's involvement in "terrorism" -whatever the defination. Some people also think that Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were also really great, but we don't see many arrests of Nazi networks around Europe. People that think that the Nazis were great are - well - ignored by Euroepan states and Rob Wainwright and his Europol. There is something very wrong here - in terms of equality before the law in the EU and in European states, as well as equal enforcements of the laws!

That will change, as the case study of the French State's abusive responses to the  Toulouse shooting is underway.The misguided and openly anti-Muslim response by the French state to the shootings by a lone gunman is now forming a case study that will lay the ground work for an even larger study of the Dutch Nation and its responses to the Theo van Gogh murder.  What appear to be constancies are that any violent act by someone of a Muslim background is now "terrorism":

1. then followed by claims of "our 9-11";

2.  then collective punishment, including "arrests" of "an Islamist network."

3.  Also throw in the claim that the attack by a lone perpetrator of Muslim background is "an attack on our values. 

Violent crimes by Muslims are now "terrorism," but beyond the collective punishment that follows is the unwillingness to include the voices of opposition to these abusive policies on the part of the "victim" State. The Muslim communities that fall victim to post-violence policies appear to be excluded from any debate about security issues and criminalization of the community appears to also occur.

The study framework - emancipation-advocacy approach from Critical Terrorism studies.  The framework I will be using uses a rational actor, "the French State" and what is referred to as emancipation-advocacy approach from Critical Terrorism studies. The approach includes removing the state centric approach and the view of the "French State as victim," used by orthodox terrorism studies and the global mass media’s coverage of the Toulouse shooting. The approach is from the view of the French Muslims who are now enduring oppressive measures and arrests in the aftermath of the shooting. Also a part of the approach will be the French State's obligations under European and human rights conventions, these "arrests" as part of an "Islamist network" as part of limits on religious freedom and expression, which is a part of the limits on freedoms of French Muslims, including attempts to close an up coming Islamic conference.

Question: What are the reactions of the French State after the lone gunman shootings at Toulouse and how do they square with the French State’s as a democratic, pluralistic society and international obligations to its Muslim citizens?

A couple of hypotheses:

  1. The responses of the French State to the shooting by a lone gunman amount to violation of human rights: freedom of speech, freedom of expression, religious freedom, among other possible violations.

  2.  "Islamist networks" are actually religious networks and  "arresting members" in the aftermath of violence is due to associations (real and over the Internet) the religious network has with the perpetrator.

  3. Violence by anyone of Muslim background is always branded as "jihad" and "terrorism."


Something will be done about these abuses of the French State. I will be mailing through standard posts this report to international institutions, including the United Nations,  and hope that awareness can be raised and actions taken against misguided and anti-Muslim responses by European nations in the aftermath of "Muslim violence." Again - this case study will lay the ground work for a larger study of the Dutch State. While Sarkozy intends to abuse the human rights of Muslim in the aftermath of this horrible shooting for his own political gains - I also intend to take full advantage in the name of advocacy for French Muslims, raise awareness of how much work needs to be done in Europe to advance human rights and frame proper responses to violence that do not collectively punish whole communities and criminalize the practice of religious faith or speech.

The paper will make recommendations for individuals and international organizations to get involved and to raise awareness that will based on study findings. Since European Union institutions, as well as other international institutions (like the United Nations) are not doing their jobs – we must do their jobs for them. The European Union, through Europol,, will probably join in efforts to collectively punish French Muslims from the crimes of a single person. There are important issues in terms of human rights, the rule of law and basic justice the French State must anser for in terms of its highly misguided and anti-Muslim response from the violent crimes of a single person.  This must not be allowed to continue!

[caption id="attachment_3387" align="alignleft" width="150" caption="Sarkozy, the French State's anti-Muslim thug. (From Wiki)"]Sarkozy, the French State's anti-Muslim thug. (From Wiki)[/caption]

 

---

NL - Gaan na de Franse staat en zijn misbruik reactie op de nasleep van de schietpartij door een "lone wolf", een eenzame schutter bij Toulouse. De reactie van de Franse staat is nu een van een ijzeren vuist, die nu ook "arrestaties" van "islamisten" in de nep probleem van de "islamistische netwerk." De misleide en anti-moslim reactie op de beschietingen door een eenzame schutter, Mohamed Merah, nu ook onder meer het ontkennen van imams die nog nooit geweld gepredikt ingang naar het land voor een jaarlijkse Islamitische Conferentie.

Er is nu de toegevoegde element van de Franse verkiezingen en Sarkozy is op zoek naar een hobbel in de peilingen. Sarkozy reisde de weg van de vervolging van met betrekking tot de Roma, die werd gevolgd door een berisping van de Europese Unie. De Franse staat reageerde op een positieve manier als het ging om de aanwezigheid van de Roma - het is ongelooflijk hoe de EU niet kan komen tot de redding van de islamitische EU-burgers die moeten na het geweld aanvallen op de mensenrechten en burgerlijke vrijheden te doorstaan.

Islamitische netwerken en de "dreiging" is waarschijnlijk een verzonnen "bedreiging." We hebben nu gezien dat de "arrestaties" is "islamisten" door de Franse staat. Als deze "islamitische netwerken" waren een dergelijk gevaar - waarom dan niet sluiten, voordat deze "lone wolf" schieten? Het is goed mogelijk dat de mensen die gearresteerd worden gearresteerd omdat hun religieuze geloof en wellicht ook hun politieke opvattingen - ". Terrorisme 'niet hun werkelijke dreiging van Deze arrestaties, onder meer van de moeder van Merah's - moeten nauwgezet worden gevolgd door Europese en internationale instellingen voor de mensenrechten.

Tot hun krediet, Franse politie nu van mening dat Mohamed Merah niet een of andere "al-Qeada missie" - maar was helemaal alleen in zijn acties. Dat is niet moeilijk te begrijpen, omdat iedereen kan beweren dat een "al-Qeada operatieve" en dit is gedaan door personen in het verleden. Maar - we zien de gebruikelijke dubieuze claim van "een islamitische netwerk" en de gebruikelijke "botsing der beschavingen 'reactie in collectief schuld en straf van de gehele moslimgemeenschap. Deze misleidende reactie is iets wat we gewoon niet zien tegen de radicale rechts-netwerken, maar alleen met "islamitische netwerken" (die wellicht niet meer dat religieuze studiegroepen. Verwacht Rob Wainwright en zijn Europol tot het begrip explot "islamitische netwerken." Ja - ik hoop dat 'islamitische netwerken' bestaan ​​en dat het hun activiteit te beperken tot discussie alleen.

In feite - nu zijn we uit te vinden dat de islamitische groepering - de leden die nu zijn gearresteerd - GEEN verbinding met Mohamed Merah had. Dus - waarom op Gods groene aarde worden ze gearresteerd? Welke van hun vrijheid od meningsuiting en godsdienst? Wat zijn de Franse staat de verplichtingen om de mensenrechten van de Ridders van Pride islamistische groep!

Dat bestuderen we ...

Dat leren we over ...

Dat zullen we de bewustwording over!

In een de ideale wereld, de Franse Staat laat gaan de leden van de Knights of Pride en laat vervolgens alleen - of lijdt internationale berisping en consequense voor zijn acties tegen de Ridders van Pride islamistische groep als zij heeft gedaan in haar acties tegen Roma!

Dus - sommige mensen, zoals al-Qaeda - zo? - liking al-Qaeda heeft niets te maken met betrokkenheid van een persoon in "terrorisme"-ongeacht het Begrip. Sommige mensen vinden ook dat Adolf Hitler en de nazi's waren ook echt geweldig, maar we zien niet veel arrestaties van de nazi-netwerken in Europa. Mensen die denken dat de nazi's groot waren zijn - goed - genegeerd door Euroepan staten en Rob Wainwright en zijn Europol. Er is iets heel erg mis hier - in termen van gelijkheid voor de wet in de EU en in Europese landen, en de gelijke versterkingen van de wetten!

Dat zal veranderen, aangezien de case study van misbruik van de Franse Staat reacties op de Toulouse-opnamen zijn underway.The misleid en openlijk anti-moslim reactie van de Franse staat aan de opnames van een eenzame schutter is nu de vorming van een case study die leggen de grondwerk voor een nog grotere studie van de Nederlandse natie en haar antwoorden op de Theo van Gogh moord. Wat lijkt te zijn constanten zijn dat elke gewelddadige handeling door iemand van een moslim achtergrond is nu "terrorisme":

1. dan gevolgd door claims van "onze 9-11";

2. dan collectieve bestraffing, met inbegrip van "arrestaties" van "een islamitische netwerk."

3. Ook gooien in de bewering dat de aanval door een enkele dader van islamitische achtergrond is "een aanval op onze waarden.

Gewelddadige misdrijven door de moslims zijn nu "terrorisme", maar verder dan de collectieve straf die volgt is de onwil om de stemmen van de oppositie tegen deze onrechtmatige beleid van de kant van het "slachtoffer" staat te nemen. De islamitische gemeenschappen die slachtoffer zijn van post-geweld beleid lijken te worden uitgesloten van elke discussie over veiligheidskwesties en criminalisering van de gemeenschap lijkt zich ook voordoen.

De studie kader - emancipatie-advocacy aanpak van kritische Terrorisme studies. Het kader dat ik zal gebruiken maakt gebruik van een rationele actor, "de Franse Staat" en wat wordt aangeduid als emancipatie-advocacy aanpak van kritische Terrorisme studies. De aanpak omvat het verwijderen van de staat centric aanpak en de visie van de "Franse staat als slachtoffer," wordt gebruikt door de orthodoxe terrorisme studies en de mondiale massamedia de dekking van de Toulouse schieten. De aanpak is vanuit het oogpunt van de Franse moslims die nu doorstaan ​​onderdrukkende maatregelen en arrestaties in de nasleep van de schietpartij. Ook een deel van de aanpak zal zijn van de Franse Staat verplichtingen op grond van Europese en mensenrechtenverdragen, deze "arrestaties" als onderdeel van een "islamitische netwerk" als onderdeel van de beperkingen op de vrijheid van godsdienst en meningsuiting, dat is een deel van de beperkingen van vrijheden van de Franse moslims, met inbegrip van pogingen om een ​​up komende islamitische conferentie af te sluiten.

Vraag: Wat zijn de reacties van de Franse staat na de eenzame schutter schietpartij in Toulouse en hoe ze zijn vierkant met de Franse staat is als een democratische, pluralistische samenleving en de internationale verplichtingen aan haar islamitische burgers?

Een paar hypotheses:

1. De reacties van de Franse Staat aan de beschieting door een eenzame schutter bedrag aan schending van de mensenrechten: vrijheid van meningsuiting, vrijheid van meningsuiting, godsdienstvrijheid, naast andere mogelijke overtredingen.
2.  "Islamitische netwerken" zijn eigenlijk religieuze netwerken en "arresteren leden" in de nasleep van het geweld is het gevolg van verenigingen (echte en via internet) de religieuze netwerk heeft met de dader.

3..Geweld door iedereen van islamitische achtergrond is altijd gebrandmerkt als "jihad" en "terrorisme".

Iets zal worden gedaan over deze schendingen van de Franse staat. Ik zal mailing met behulp van standaard berichten in dit verslag aan de internationale instellingen, waaronder de Verenigde Naties zijn, en hopen dat het bewustzijn kan worden verhoogd en de acties tegen misleidende en anti-moslim reacties van Europese landen in de nasleep van "moslim geweld." Again - dit geval studie zal de grondslag worden gelegd werk voor een grotere studie van de Nederlandse Staat. Terwijl Sarkozy is van plan de rechten van de mens van de islamitische misbruik in de nasleep van deze verschrikkelijke schietpartij voor zijn eigen politiek gewin - ook ik ben van plan om optimaal te profiteren in de naam van belangenbehartiging voor de Franse moslims, bewust te maken van hoe veel werk moet worden gedaan in Europa om de mensenrechten te bevorderen en kaderen de juiste antwoorden op het geweld die niet collectief te straffen hele gemeenschappen en criminaliseren van de praktijk van het geloof.

Het papier zal aanbevelingen doen voor individuen en internationale organisaties om betrokken te raken en het bewustzijn dat zal op basis van bevindingen van de studie te verhogen. Aangezien de Europese instellingen, en andere internationale instellingen (zoals de Verenigde Naties) zijn niet hun werk te doen - we moeten doen hun werk voor hen. De Europese Unie, via Europol, zal, waarschijnlijk aansluiten bij de inspanningen om gezamenlijk Franse moslims te straffen van de misdaden van een enkele persoon. Er zijn belangrijke kwesties op het gebied van de mensenrechten, moet de rechtsstaat en de fundamentele recht van de Franse staat anser in termen van de zeer misplaatste en anti-moslim reactie van de gewelddadige misdaden van een enkele persoon. Dit moet niet worden toegestaan ​​om verder te gaan!